Repowise scores FaserF/fritz-tools at 4.3 out of 10 for defect risk, which reads as needs work, alongside maintainability 6.8 and performance risk 9.8 on the same scale. There are 19 open findings across the three pillars, and the lowest-scoring file is fritzflash.py at 2.4. Scores are computed from complexity, duplication, churn and git fix history, not from a linter.
Per-file health scores from complexity, duplication, coverage, churn, and ownership markers, ranked into a fix-next queue, with risk, security, and trend in one place.
