Repowise scores FaserF/ha-foodsharing at 6.4 out of 10 for defect risk, which reads as fair, alongside maintainability 7.6 and performance risk 9.9 on the same scale. There are 206 open findings across the three pillars, and the lowest-scoring file is config_flow.py at 1.6. Scores are computed from complexity, duplication, churn and git fix history, not from a linter.
Per-file health scores from complexity, duplication, coverage, churn, and ownership markers, ranked into a fix-next queue, with risk, security, and trend in one place.
