Repowise scores FaserF/ha-gsa at 9.6 out of 10 for defect risk, which reads as excellent, alongside maintainability 9.7 and performance risk 10.0 on the same scale. There are 5 open findings across the three pillars, and the lowest-scoring file is coordinator.py at 7.3. Scores are computed from complexity, duplication, churn and git fix history, not from a linter.
Per-file health scores from complexity, duplication, coverage, churn, and ownership markers, ranked into a fix-next queue, with risk, security, and trend in one place.
