Repowise scores FaserF/ha-payback at 9.8 out of 10 for defect risk, which reads as excellent, alongside maintainability 9.8 and performance risk 10.0 on the same scale. There are 11 open findings across the three pillars, and the lowest-scoring file is coordinator.py at 7.5. Scores are computed from complexity, duplication, churn and git fix history, not from a linter.
Per-file health scores from complexity, duplication, coverage, churn, and ownership markers, ranked into a fix-next queue, with risk, security, and trend in one place.
