repowiserepowise
Sign in
abdo12km/autocompile
OverviewDocsArchitectureKnowledge GraphFilesCode HealthRefactoring

People & History

CommitsContributorsDecisions
ChatPro
Stats
repowiserepowise
ExplorePricingDocs
Sign inIndex repoIndex your repo free
repowiseabdo12km/autocompile
AU
AU

abdo12km / autocompile

pythonmaind1c799b20.5K linessynced 12h ago

Code health

8.6out of 10Excellent

This codebase scores 8.6 out of 10 on defect risk, which we rate excellent. It also scores maintainability 9.2 and static performance risk 9.6 out of 10. The three are scored separately and never blended into one number. The files you change most are the weak spot: 9 of 125 files are git hotspots, and they average 5.2.

Full health report →
Documentation104pages0 with model-written prose, 104 built from the indexScore validation6/204.69× baselineOf the 20 lowest-health files, 6 were bug-fixed in the last 6 months — 4.69× the 6% baseline
Lines of code
20.5K
Files
125
Symbols
601
Modules
7
Languages
5

Recent activity

All commits →

Commits

No commits indexed yet.

Decisions

  • docs(eval): reconcile live codebase docs and restore evaluator compatibilityproposed · 12h ago
  • (feat): Wire AutoPhase into package summary seamproposed · 12h ago
  • Rebrand project to AutoCompile and reorganize artifactsproposed · 12h ago
  • Memoize deterministic tool/evaluation results with content-addressed keysproposed · 12h ago
  • Use canonical CompilerGym AutoPhase feature identifiers and compact prompt serializationproposed · 12h ago
  • Treat AutoPhase feature extraction as text-based approximation; document parity caveatproposed · 12h ago

Needs attention

26 open
  • medium severity. Proposeddocs(eval): reconcile live codebase docs and restore evaluator compatibilityAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. Proposed(feat): Wire AutoPhase into package summary seamAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. ProposedRebrand project to AutoCompile and reorganize artifactsAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. ProposedMemoize deterministic tool/evaluation results with content-addressed keysAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. ProposedUse canonical CompilerGym AutoPhase feature identifiers and compact prompt serializationAuto-proposed decision awaiting review

Where the risk concentrates

All 9 hotspots →

Ranked by prior bug fixes and change frequency, mined from full git history rather than from the code alone.

FileChurnPrior fixesMaintainersCommits 90d
test_smoke.pytests98.3th5bug magnet3bus factor 115
eval_search_sft.pyscripts/training96.6th32bus factor 19
train_sft.pyscripts/training94.9th12bus factor 18
convert_search_labels_to_sft.pyscripts/training93.2th02bus factor 15
eval_agent_sft.pyscripts/training91.5th12bus factor 16

Composition

Open the graph →
python 47%markdown 34%json 17%yaml 2%toml 1%

Explore this codebase

  • Docs104 pages across 7 modules→
  • ChatAsk this codebase a question and get an answer with its sources→
  • Files125 files with per-file docs, health and history→
  • ArchitectureDependency graph, layers, and 1 entry points→
  • Code healthPer-file scores, 241 open findings, coverage and refactoring targets→
  • Knowledge graphEntities, communities, and the paths between them→
  • Change couplingFiles that keep changing together, mined from commit history→
  • CommitsChange-risk ranked history with agent provenance→
  • ContributorsBus factor, per-file maintainers, and the human/agent split→
  • StatsSize class, origin, lifetime churn, rhythm and records→
  • CostsWhat indexing this snapshot cost, by model and by run→