Every commit scored for change-risk against this repo's own history, so 'elevated' means elevated here rather than on some global curve.
Needs review
4 commits sit in this repo's top risk tercile, which is 33% of the 12scored. The cut is drawn against this codebase's own history rather than a global curve, so a quiet repo still fills its top band, and here it starts at 3.9 out of 10. What pushes a commit up is size and spread together: a large change confined to one area scores below a smaller one scattered across a dozen files.
Commit categories over time, read off the subject line. Fixes carry the accent because that is the series this chart exists to show.
Consistently feature-driven across its history.
Ranked by change-risk, highest first. Priority is a tercile of this repo's own distribution, so a quiet repo still fills its top band.
| # | Commit | Author | When | Lines | Risk | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | a3bef353Initial commit | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +916 -0 | 96%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 2 | 54a1bb71Update README.md | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +37 -2 | 88%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 3 | 0c4acda5Idea | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +34 -5 | 79%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 4 | f8f7eaccDependency Helpers | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +10 -0 | 71%Elevated | less familiar author than baseline |
| 5 | 8abe648aAdd .whitesource configuration file | whitesource-bolt-for-github[bot] | 6y ago | +8 -0 | 63%Typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 6 | aa02a1f7Add renovate.json | renovate[bot] | 4y ago | +6 -0 | 54%Typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 7 | bc79ce0dCreate environment.yml | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +6 -0 | 46%Typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 8 | ed94f315Update README.md | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +4 -2 | 38%Typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 9 | b3eec707Update README.md | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +3 -3 | 29%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 10 | b90b87e1Update README.md | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +3 -2 | 21%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 11 | 1cf489aeUpdate .whitesource | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +2 -2 | 13%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 12 | a80af24fUpdate README.md | Banee Ishaque K | 6y ago | +1 -1 | 4%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
Two views of the same model: where the cuts fall, and what commit shape lands you above them.
Every scored commit, binned on the raw 0 to 10 score rather than the percentile. Percentile ranks are uniform by construction, so that axis has no shape to draw. The dashed lines are the tercile cuts behind each row's priority pill.
The 12 most recent commits, on their own recency sample rather than the feed above: that defaults to risk-sorted, so reusing it would plot only the top tercile and call it the spread. Big and scattered is what the model penalises. Click a dot to open it.
baneeishaque/Scrap_Voter_List has 14 commits in its history from 3 contributors, the first of them Feb 7, 2020. No file in the repository changed in the last 90 days. Every commit is scored for change risk from its size, spread and the history of the files it touches.
