Every commit scored for change-risk against this repo's own history, so 'elevated' means elevated here rather than on some global curve.
Needs review
3 commits sit in this repo's top risk tercile, which is 30% of the 10scored. The cut is drawn against this codebase's own history rather than a global curve, so a quiet repo still fills its top band, and here it starts at 9.5 out of 10. What pushes a commit up is size and spread together: a large change confined to one area scores below a smaller one scattered across a dozen files.
Commit categories over time, read off the subject line. Fixes carry the accent because that is the series this chart exists to show.
Began other-led, now leaning feature.
Ranked by change-risk, highest first. Priority is a tercile of this repo's own distribution, so a quiet repo still fills its top band.
| # | Commit | Author | When | Lines | Risk | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df320f18 Created final_results.csv containing comprehensive results for all models. | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +1.5K -242 | 95%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 2 | 1b60c75eRemoved streamlit | Mukundh | 5mo ago | +918 -160 | 80%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 3 | b6223be8updated code and structure | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +899 -61 | 80%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 4 | 8d82c0d8created files and started lr (without large CSV) | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +553 -0 | 65%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 5 | efa9d561added reliablity summary seeds and pca | Mukundh | 2mo ago | +399 -3 | 55%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 6 | 843ac441updated readme | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +142 -59 | 45%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 7 | 79fdc2afupdated readme with values | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +26 -20 | 35%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 8 | 609b6c11updated readme | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +10 -10 | 25%Below typical | more scattered than baseline |
| 9 | 719dc0acAdd requirements.txt with essential libraries for the project | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +6 -0 | 15%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 10 | 445d1490Initial commit | Mukundh | 6mo ago | +1 -0 | 5%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
Two views of the same model: where the cuts fall, and what commit shape lands you above them.
Every scored commit, binned on the raw 0 to 10 score rather than the percentile. Percentile ranks are uniform by construction, so that axis has no shape to draw. The dashed lines are the tercile cuts behind each row's priority pill.
The 10 most recent commits, on their own recency sample rather than the feed above: that defaults to risk-sorted, so reusing it would plot only the top tercile and call it the spread. Big and scattered is what the model penalises. Click a dot to open it.
mukundhr/modelguard has 10 commits in its history from 1 contributor, the first of them Jan 18, 2026. In the last 90 days 2 files were touched, 2 times in total, most often pca.py. Every commit is scored for change risk from its size, spread and the history of the files it touches.
