Every commit scored for change-risk against this repo's own history, so 'elevated' means elevated here rather than on some global curve.
Needs review
4 commits sit in this repo's top risk tercile, which is 33% of the 12scored. The cut is drawn against this codebase's own history rather than a global curve, so a quiet repo still fills its top band, and here it starts at 9.9 out of 10. What pushes a commit up is size and spread together: a large change confined to one area scores below a smaller one scattered across a dozen files.
Commit categories over time, read off the subject line. Fixes carry the accent because that is the series this chart exists to show.
Consistently other-driven across its history.
Ranked by change-risk, highest first. Priority is a tercile of this repo's own distribution, so a quiet repo still fills its top band.
| # | Commit | Author | When | Lines | Review priority | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64f1516cEval2 draft | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +24.5K -1.3K | 96thElevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 2 | 445c3129Update experiments | Oliver Hennhöfer | 3mo ago | +8.7K -3.9K | 79thElevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 3 | d8a9c8eaEval2 shift refinement | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +23.3K -23.0K | 79thElevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 4 | 20606030Initial Commit | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +23.6K -197 | 79thElevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 5 | f97a6de4Refactor | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +5.9K -25.4K | 63thTypical | more lines added than baseline |
| 6 | 72a8ce00Updated Exchangeability Martingales | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +2.6K -2.3K | 50thTypical | more lines added than baseline |
| 7 | 0857b2d8Update eval4 | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +2.7K -315 | 50thTypical | more lines added than baseline |
| 8 | 4f041c08Add eval4 | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +2.0K -2.1K | 38thTypical | more lines added than baseline |
| 9 | 7bc15cafNew Eval | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +849 -2 | 29thBelow typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 10 | 5bd89cf5Initial commit | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +230 -0 | 21thBelow typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 11 | 69770124cleanup + cli commands | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +52 -22 | 13thBelow typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 12 | 76695533Create PAPER_DEFAULT_COMMANDS.md | Oliver Hennhöfer | 4mo ago | +32 -0 | 4thBelow typical | more lines added than baseline |
Two views of the same model: where the cuts fall, and what commit shape lands you above them.
Every scored commit, binned on the raw 0 to 10 score rather than the percentile. Percentile ranks are uniform by construction, so that axis has no shape to draw. The dashed lines are the tercile cuts behind each row's priority pill.
The 12 most recent commits, on their own recency sample rather than the feed above: that defaults to risk-sorted, so reusing it would plot only the top tercile and call it the spread. Big and scattered is what the model penalises. Click a dot to open it.
Repowise tracks change history across 21 files in oliverhennhoefer/nonconform-paper. In the last 90 days 16 files were touched, 26 times in total, most often plot_4_exchangeability_martingale_control.py. Every commit is scored for change risk from its size, spread and the history of the files it touches.
