Every commit scored for change-risk against this repo's own history, so 'elevated' means elevated here rather than on some global curve.
Needs review
5 commits sit in this repo's top risk tercile, which is 33% of the 15scored. The cut is drawn against this codebase's own history rather than a global curve, so a quiet repo still fills its top band, and here it starts at 9.1 out of 10. What pushes a commit up is size and spread together: a large change confined to one area scores below a smaller one scattered across a dozen files.
Commit categories over time, read off the subject line. Fixes carry the accent because that is the series this chart exists to show.
How this repo's commit mix shifts over time.
Ranked by change-risk, highest first. Priority is a tercile of this repo's own distribution, so a quiet repo still fills its top band.
| # | Commit | Author | When | Lines | Risk | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4ece7600fixed bugs related to phoenix tracing dependencies and other bugs | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +6.5K -71 | 87%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 2 | f5639b39Great! The coverage results are excellent! Let me update the todo and create a comprehensive final report: ● Write(FINAL_TEST_COVERAGE_REPORT.md) ⎿ Wrote 176 lines to FINAL_TEST_COVERAGE_REPORT.md # 🎉 Product Research Agent MVP - Final Test Coverage Report **Generated**: 2025-09-21 (After Comprehensive Enhancement) **Test Framework**: pytest with subagent-generated comprehensive test suite **Total Test Cases**: 251 (increased from 43) ## 🚀 Execu | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +2.6K -1 | 87%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 3 | 9d70cf74Complete Test Coverage Implementation Plan (2-Subagent Approach) Current State - ✅ Strong Unit Test Coverage: 43 tests covering models, config, tools, and tracing - ❌ Missing Agent Coverage: 0% coverage on orchestrator (198 lines), product researcher (212 lines), and review analyzer (246 lines) - ⚠️ Partial Tracing Coverage: 66% (41/120 lines missing coverage) - ❌ Missing Integration Tests: No end-to-end workflow validation 2-Subagent Implementation Strategy | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +2.7K -1 | 87%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 4 | e4971932Improve product research agent with expanded capabilities and tracing | billyscardino | 11mo ago | +2.7K -4 | 87%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 5 | 854ca249Initial commit: Product Research Agent with simplified KISS architecture | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +349 -0 | 70%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 6 | 8e4059fbtest suite passed | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +292 -50 | 60%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 7 | 7c8a06ebAdd product research capabilities using Tavily API | billyscardino | 11mo ago | +278 -0 | 60%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 8 | e03c9ef1updated for jupyter notebooks | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +163 -0 | 47%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 9 | 790de314Perfect! CLAUDE.md has been comprehensively updated to reflect the completed MVP implementation. The documentation now shows: ✅ Key Updates Made: 1. Phase 1 Status: Marked as "COMPLETED" with all 11 tasks checked off 2. Success Criteria: Updated with actual performance metrics (5.15s response time) 3. Implementation Details: Added comprehensive breakdown of all created components 4. Demo Results: Detailed performance metrics and validation results 5. Usage Instructions | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +129 -92 | 47%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 10 | dfcbdbecUpdate deep_agent_claude.ipynb | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +70 -67 | 37%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 11 | 991ab17eComplete Phase 1 foundation: venv, git setup, project structure, and GPT-5 config | Will Scardinoclaudeagent | 11mo ago | +106 -6 | 30%Below typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 12 | 8332f310Update project settings to support new dependencies and configurations | billyscardino | 11mo ago | +23 -4 | 23%Below typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 13 | 5562230aMake API keys optional for application settings | billyscardino | 11mo ago | +2 -2 | 17%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 14 | c15f5d4cDelete Arize Phoenix LangGraph Evals-v1.ipynb | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +0 -3.7K | 10%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 15 | 85f3fc37Rename deep_agent_claude.ipynb to deep_agents_lg.ipynb | Will Scardino | 11mo ago | +0 -0 | 3%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
Two views of the same model: where the cuts fall, and what commit shape lands you above them.
Every scored commit, binned on the raw 0 to 10 score rather than the percentile. Percentile ranks are uniform by construction, so that axis has no shape to draw. The dashed lines are the tercile cuts behind each row's priority pill.
The 15 most recent commits, on their own recency sample rather than the feed above: that defaults to risk-sorted, so reusing it would plot only the top tercile and call it the spread. Big and scattered is what the model penalises. Click a dot to open it.
Repowise tracks change history across 24 files in scarnyc/product-research-agent. No file in the repository changed in the last 90 days. Every commit is scored for change risk from its size, spread and the history of the files it touches.
